[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Dec 1998 22:46:56 -0500 (EST) |
981203 Klaus Weide wrote:
> The fix in that patch should prevent the memory corruption,
> but it introduces a memory leak.
again for my education -- & i suspect other lynx-devers' -- ,
what is the difference between memory corruption/leaks?
as for signals, man signal gets a brief account of signal(2) ,
but it is hardly enlightening (KW mentioned this in another message).
i will test with KW's small patch shortly.
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
- lynx-dev 2-8-1 bug: print vs partial, Philip Webb, 1998/12/01
- Re: lynx-dev 2-8-1 bug: print vs partial, Leonid Pauzner, 1998/12/03
- lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption,
Philip Webb <=
- Re: lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, Larry W. Virden, 1998/12/03
- Re: lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, pg, 1998/12/04
- Re: lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, Larry W. Virden, 1998/12/04
- Re: lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, Philip Webb, 1998/12/04
- Re: lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, mattack, 1998/12/04
- Re: lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, Larry W. Virden, 1998/12/04
- Re: lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, David Woolley, 1998/12/07
Re: lynx-dev 2-8-1 bug: print vs partial, Philip Webb, 1998/12/03
Re: lynx-dev 2-8-1 bug: print vs partial, Philip Webb, 1998/12/04