[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lynx-dev Re: when, where, why "kb/sec"? Any votes for a "simple" Lynx
From: |
Sinan Kaan Yerli |
Subject: |
lynx-dev Re: when, where, why "kb/sec"? Any votes for a "simple" Lynx |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 1998 15:18:48 +0100 |
(27/08/1998 08:26) address@hidden:
>(Changing one function for a more general one which doesn't increase code
>size, such as LYOptions's form-options code is a Good Thing, however).
The only place left that is not standard I think is the 'bookmark'
section which can be joined as a big junk of <input> field in the
Options UIP (where it actually belongs)?
Of course 'v=' or 'v[a-z]' has to be generalised within the line editor
not from LYBookmark. Hmmm... more work.
What about _the_ big dream: combining/re-organizing
'userdef.h lynx.cfg, .lynxrc, OPTIONS'
>A couple of examples:
>
> + the way I cleaned up the clutter in LYOptions.c - moving
> repetitive code into macros.
>
> + the cleanup of the temporary file handling functions (instead of
> plastering the code with #if VMS/#else/#if DOSPATH/#else/...,
> move structurally-similar stuff into macros or functions.
For example a centralised 'bindkey/macro/keymap' for all keyboard actions.
Am I day dreaming? :-)
--
Sinan Kaan Yerli <address@hidden>
- lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"? Any votes for a "simple" Lynx, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/08/26
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"? Any votes for a "simple" Lynx, dickey, 1998/08/26
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"? Any votes for a "simple" Lynx, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/08/26
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"? Any votes for a "simple" Lynx, dickey, 1998/08/27
- lynx-dev Re: when, where, why "kb/sec"? Any votes for a "simple" Lynx,
Sinan Kaan Yerli <=
- lynx-dev messy code, Philip Webb, 1998/08/27
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"? Any votes for a "simple" Lynx, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/08/27