Re: lynx-dev lynx -lss option bad [BSDI-Support-Request #53069]

[Philip Webb]

980721 Larry Virden wrote: 
> I myself am torn over whether experimental code should be removed
> if not currently being worked on.
> If it's removed, then it is likely that it will never be worked on.
> If it's present, then perhaps someone will pick up the banner.
 
yes, that's a good point,
but just leaving it forgotten in a Release is surely bad practice.
could we do a `reverse patch' operation:
ie move extracted material to an archive directory like To Do,
whence people could grab it & play with it when they felt inclined?
that might be a better stimulant for typical Lynx programmers,
who tend to lack time rather than motivation.
does TD have any comment?

-- 
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT     ___________//___,  Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT    `-O----------O---'  University of Toronto