Re: address@hidden: lynx-dev caching after \ (was why reload etc?)]

[T.E.Dickey]

> 
> > Would it be possible, as an alternative to quadrupling lynx's size and 
> > memory footprint, to add in the utilities directory a caching proxy that 
>  
> Please not in the distribution itself (a link at the distribution site 
> okay).  [Campaign to get the distribution source down to 1.44MB!!!!!!] 
perhaps a win32-only source distribution could get down to 1.44MB, but
I'm not sure (there's not _that_ much VMS-only or UNIX-only source)
  
> __Henry 


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey