[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1dev.6
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1dev.6 |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Apr 1998 21:02:52 -0400 (EDT) |
>
> > From: "T.E.Dickey" <address@hidden>
> > Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1998 18:38:25 -0400 (EDT)
> >...
> > * Modify HTML.c, ifdef'ing some of the logic involved in unstacking tags.
> > It
> > appears to be not completely necessary: makes Lynx a little faster, at
> > the
> > cost of making the tagsoup parser do the wrong thing. Some entries in
> > the
> > tagsoup DTD table versus the sortasgml table have SGML_EMPTY versus
> > SGML_MIXED. This information is used to control unstacking (in the
> > color-style configuration as well). There is still a problem evidenced
> > when toggling between the two parsers in the Lynx main help page, but
> > that
> > appears to be missing logic in 2.8's version of the tagsoup parser. - TD
>
> Do u have an example of html fragment that doesn't work right with the
> updated tagsoup parser?
I've only ifdef'd it so far - but haven't cut-over, since the places I've
ifdef'd fix some problems while creating new ones.
> Will this affect lynx's handling of legal html?
Not if I do it right. (I'm not done - I'm probably less than a quarter thru
this process, but stopped so I could source in the easier patches on my list).
> --le
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1dev.6,
T.E.Dickey <=