[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Setting up a fund for specific development?
From: |
Robert Bonomi |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Setting up a fund for specific development? |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jan 1998 21:03:19 -0600 (CST) |
+ Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 07:45:54 -0500
+ From: address@hidden (Larry W. Virden, x2487)
+ Subject: Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Setting up a fund for specific development?
+
[.. snip ..]
+ One tricky thing that has to be kept in mind if someone does go about
+ contracting for lynx work is the legal status of the lynx code versus
+ the contracted code. Since lynx is GPL, that has to be taken into account
+ if the enhanced code is ever distributed.
This is a 'non-issue'. As long as it's dealt with -beforehand-.
One simply makes it part of the deal with the contactor.
Those paying for the work have the right (legal, and moral) to
make *all* the rules, as long as they *clearly* spell them out
with the contractor, before entering into the work agreement.
And, if the contractor doesn't like those 'rules', he/she does
*not* have to do the work.
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Setting up a fund for specific development?, David Combs, 1998/01/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Setting up a fund for specific development?, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/01/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Setting up a fund for specific development?, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/01/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Setting up a fund for specific development?,
Robert Bonomi <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Setting up a fund for specific development?, David Combs, 1998/01/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Setting up a fund for specific development?, Jason F. McBrayer, 1998/01/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Setting up a fund for specific development?, Matt Ackeret, 1998/01/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Setting up a fund for specific development?, Greg Stark, 1998/01/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Setting up a fund for specific development?, David Combs, 1998/01/08