[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field
|
From: |
Al Gilman |
|
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field |
|
Date: |
Sun, 23 Nov 1997 22:45:53 -0500 (EST) |
to follow up on what Uzi Paz said:
> Any comments about using "X-URL" equivalent for mailing the stripped text
> version via the "print" command? I don't know of any apropriate header
> field, but it seems that "X-URL:" is definitly not good. .. [snip]
Can you be a little more specific as to what problem is caused by the
way it works now?
-- Al Gilman
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Foteos Macrides, 1997/11/23
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Foteos Macrides, 1997/11/24
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Foteos Macrides, 1997/11/25
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/11/25
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Michael Sokolov, 1997/11/25
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/11/26
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Michael Sokolov, 1997/11/26