[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0
From: |
Nelson Henry Eric |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:03:57 +0900 (JST) |
> Let the first person ready to do so, put out a 2.7-dev. Then, as the others
Just to keep the ball rolling, I think Wayne just did.
> get ready, they can fold in thier changes (which would be done against 2.7
> initially, then reworked against 2.7-dev?). I strongly feel that we have a
2.7-dev sounds good. There needs to be one more specific identifier as I
stated earlier so that tweaking can take place and wires don't get crossed.
Is the CHANGES file, which contributers should begin, i.e., move the one for
lynx2-7 to CHANGES2-7 and have Wayne start up a new one, friendly to everyone?
> lot of really good stuff just over the horizon for lynx. Fote has truly set
> us up to go on strongly if we just work out the organizational aspects.
You said it all.
__Henry
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV bg - fg = ok, (continued)
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0,
Nelson Henry Eric <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, Wayne Buttles, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, T.E.Dickey, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process), Al Gilman, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process), William Denton, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process), Al Gilman, 1997/02/27
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process), Andrew Kuchling, 1997/02/27