Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx version 2.7 compilation problem (SCO Unix)

[Alan Cox]

>       I took the time to address your stated assumption that remove()
> was used "for VMS, which has no unlink()", and to review the design
> principles of the past several years, as general information for future
> developers.

remove() is the correct call. See the ANSI C library specs

> (or new ones which perhaps have old headers unreplaced).  Nothing short
> of physically replacing remove() calls with unlink() calls appeared to
> work in that particular case.  Otherwise, they still get the error
> message about "__UNLINK", which is an external symbol, not in the
> Lynx code.

On the contrary. Linking the extra module

SCOcrud.c

int remove(const char *path)
{
        return unlink(path);
}

with the right includes will do the job nicely

;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;