[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question
From: |
odobryabov |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Jul 2017 04:39:43 -0700 (MST) |
We tried to connect to MicroTik L2tp server and it works perfect with ping
and HTML and everything else. Super!
We think that was an additional (and probably wrong) ZLB packet from the
server after ICRP message.
We tried to change that "special case" like this:
/* Handle the special case of the ICCN acknowledge */
if (l2tp->phase == PPPOL2TP_STATE_ICCN_SENT && l2tp->peer_nr >
l2tp->our_ns) {
l2tp->phase = PPPOL2TP_STATE_DATA;
*l2tp->our_ns++;*
}
Connection doesn't interrupt now, but neither ping nor HTML.
So, we don't know why. But, ok, we continue working with MicroTik :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/lwip2-0-2-l2tp-question-tp30013p30135.html
Sent from the lwip-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/06
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, Sylvain Rochet, 2017/07/06
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, Sylvain Rochet, 2017/07/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/10
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/14
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/11
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/11
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/11
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/11
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question,
odobryabov <=