Re: [lwip-users] lwip-users Digest, Vol 163, Issue 44

[CHASE CHENG]

Hi Simon.

I read 2.0 already take off the related code, I just want to make sure that I didn't misunderstand your design.

Thanks for your time.

Chase

2017-03-28 0:00 GMT+08:00 <address@hidden>:

Send lwip-users mailing list submissions to
        address@hidden

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        address@hidden

You can reach the person managing the list at
        address@hidden

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of lwip-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. lwip_accept error handling return wrong value in lwip 1.4.1
      (CHASE CHENG)
   2. Re: lwip_accept error handling return wrong value in lwip
      1.4.1 (Simon Goldschmidt)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:46:19 +0800
From: CHASE CHENG <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: [lwip-users] lwip_accept error handling return wrong value in
        lwip 1.4.1
Message-ID:
        <CADT1G-VpezyqYbXrGUm8h9G0UzRnGef9Jm_address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi all,

Based on lwip 1.4.1, function lwip_accept  (api/sockets.c line 342)
return EOPNOTSUPP;
I think this line should return -1, since this function return socket
number but error status.
please tell me if I am right. thank you.

Regards,
Chase
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lwip-users/attachments/20170327/4f6de8ca/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:59:31 +0200
From: "Simon Goldschmidt" <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] lwip_accept error handling return wrong
        value in lwip 1.4.1
Message-ID:
        <trinity-c5990aee-28c2-4195-9bd8-454864d0a40f-address@hidden>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

CHASE CHENG wrote:
> Based on lwip 1.4.1, function lwip_accept ?(api/sockets.c line 342)
> return EOPNOTSUPP;?
> I think this line should return -1, since this function return socket number but error status.
> please tell me if I am right. thank you.

Yes, you're right. But 1.4.1 is more than six years old now and this bug has already been fixed in the meantime.

Simon



------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

------------------------------

End of lwip-users Digest, Vol 163, Issue 44
*******************************************