Re: [lwip-users] Implementation Suggestion

[address@hidden]

Jaime Fernandez Hoffiz wrote:
> I see lwip has various level of implementations,
> netconn, raw api, and what I'm currently using: lwip_accept
> Which one would you suggest I use?
That depends on your requirements. See the beginning of 'doc/rawapi.txt' 
for a description of the 3 API forms and the chose the one that fits you 
best.

> All seem to be non blocking and fit my needs.

They're not exactly "all non blocking", but you can use them all in a 
nonblocking way, yes.

Simon