[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] PPP - TCP
From: |
Sylvain Rochet |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] PPP - TCP |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:44:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Hi Norberto,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:25:17PM -0200, Norberto R. de Goes Jr. wrote:
> Hi Sylvain.
>
> I had problem with the patch file (git use). Then I fetch/rebase only my
> lwip git-repo today (hash = 4beacc4ca0b2dd166dd50b1b8614f87fe0b67516), ok?
Yes, it's almost the same thing, I took the time to clean and split the
patch and push it.
> The uptdated lwip code works fine here (VJ_SUPPORT=1)!
Great, happy to hear that, looks like I managed to fix all issues about
VJ support then.
> The question is about the "noccp" parameter in pppd command line
> (VM#1, no lwip stack). It seems that it does not make difference.
As long as you are not requiring MPPE, enabling or disabling CCP
shouldn't change anything. Note a wrong CCP behavior was fixed in
6185bf6f61.
Sylvain
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [lwip-users] PPP - TCP, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] PPP - TCP, Norberto R. de Goes Jr., 2016/01/18
- Re: [lwip-users] PPP - TCP, Sylvain Rochet, 2016/01/20
- Re: [lwip-users] PPP - TCP, Norberto R. de Goes Jr., 2016/01/21
- Re: [lwip-users] PPP - TCP, Sylvain Rochet, 2016/01/21
- Re: [lwip-users] PPP - TCP, Norberto R. de Goes Jr., 2016/01/22
- Re: [lwip-users] PPP - TCP, Sylvain Rochet, 2016/01/22
- Re: [lwip-users] PPP - TCP, Norberto R. de Goes Jr., 2016/01/22
- Re: [lwip-users] PPP - TCP, Sylvain Rochet, 2016/01/22
- Re: [lwip-users] PPP - TCP, Sylvain Rochet, 2016/01/23
- Re: [lwip-users] PPP - TCP, Norberto R. de Goes Jr., 2016/01/25
- Re: [lwip-users] PPP - TCP,
Sylvain Rochet <=