[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Assertion on Select
|
From: |
Sandra Gilge |
|
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Assertion on Select |
|
Date: |
Mon, 21 Sep 2015 08:45:54 +0200 |
Hallo Simon,
They support only LWIP 1.4.0. It is part of the Visual DSP++, which can be
downloaded as trial version.
http://www.analog.com/en/design-center/processors-and-dsp/evaluation-and-dev
elopment-software/vdsp-bf-sh-ts.html
The LWIP code is in the path "VisualDSP 5.1.1\Blackfin\lib\src\lwip\src" The
changes can be found by searching for
#ifdef __ADSPBLACKFIN__
I found there is another port of LWIP for Blackfin under
http://lwip.wikia.com/wiki/Available_device_drivers
Has anybody experience with this port?
Best regards,
Sandra
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden Im Auftrag von
address@hidden
Gesendet: Samstag, 19. September 2015 18:00
An: address@hidden
Betreff: lwip-users Digest, Vol 145, Issue 10
Send lwip-users mailing list submissions to
address@hidden
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
address@hidden
You can reach the person managing the list at
address@hidden
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of lwip-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Assertion on Select (Sandra Gilge (ADATIS))
2. Re: Assertion on Select (Michael Steinberg)
3. Re: Assertion on Select (address@hidden)
4. Re: Assertion on Select (address@hidden)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:19:09 +0200
From: "Sandra Gilge (ADATIS)" <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Hallo Simon,
is there a stable revision between the head revision and the latest
revision I could take?
Updating new revisions is with my port is not so easy since the port for
Blackfin is from analog devices and they made quite some changes to the lwip
stack.
Best regards,
Sandra
Am 18.09.2015 um 18:00 schrieb address@hidden:
> Send lwip-users mailing list submissions to
> address@hidden
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> address@hidden
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> address@hidden
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of lwip-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Assertion on Select (Sandra Gilge)
> 2. Re: Assertion on Select (Simon Goldschmidt)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:35:39 +0200
> From: "Sandra Gilge" <address@hidden>
> To: <address@hidden>
> Subject: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hallo Simon
>
>
>
> I don't want to move the complete code to the head revision. Is it
> enough to replace sockets.c to a newer version? Or is this a problem?
>
> I guess it is the issue #31741 that might be the problem?
>
>
>
> Here's the correspondence we already had:
>
>
>
>
>
> Sandra Gilge wrote:
>
> Now I'm having problems with following assertion when calling select.
>
> LWIP_ASSERT("sock->select_waiting >= 0", sock->select_waiting >= 0);
>
>
> Do I remember correctly that there was a bug in there somewhere?
> Depending on your thread priorities, git master could fix the issue.
>
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
> scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lwip-users/attachments/20150918/
> aa2021bc/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:50:05 +0200
> From: "Simon Goldschmidt" <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select
> Message-ID:
>
> <address@hidden
> bs60>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Sandra Gilge wrote:
>> I don?t want to move the complete code to the head revision.
>> Is it enough to replace sockets.c to a newer version? Or is this a
problem?
> Picking one file only will most certainly not work. You can do this on
your own, but honestly, I don't want to support this. If you don't want to
move to a newer version, you will have to identify the fixing changes and
try to apply them to your version.
>
>> I guess it is the issue #31741 that might be the problem?
> Maybe. But maybe that's not all, I don't know, sorry.
>
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>
> End of lwip-users Digest, Vol 145, Issue 9
> ******************************************
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 20:54:59 +0200
From: Michael Steinberg <address@hidden>
To: Mailing list for lwIP users <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Hey,
is using their netif driver plus a vanilla lwip (ie. savannah git
master) no option? I don't think the netif-interface changed much. I had no
real troubles from 1.41 to head.
I'd rather ask them to contribute their changes in a generic way, after all
they're profitting from a free stack as it seems.
Kind Regards,
Michael
Am 18.09.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Sandra Gilge (ADATIS):
> Hallo Simon,
>
> is there a stable revision between the head revision and the latest
> revision I could take?
>
> Updating new revisions is with my port is not so easy since the port
> for Blackfin is from analog devices and they made quite some changes
> to the lwip stack.
>
> Best regards,
> Sandra
>
> Am 18.09.2015 um 18:00 schrieb address@hidden:
>> Send lwip-users mailing list submissions to
>> address@hidden
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> address@hidden
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> address@hidden
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of lwip-users digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Assertion on Select (Sandra Gilge)
>> 2. Re: Assertion on Select (Simon Goldschmidt)
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:35:39 +0200
>> From: "Sandra Gilge" <address@hidden>
>> To: <address@hidden>
>> Subject: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select
>> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Hallo Simon
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't want to move the complete code to the head revision. Is it
>> enough to replace sockets.c to a newer version? Or is this a problem?
>>
>> I guess it is the issue #31741 that might be the problem?
>>
>>
>>
>> Here's the correspondence we already had:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sandra Gilge wrote:
>>
>> Now I'm having problems with following assertion when calling select.
>>
>> LWIP_ASSERT("sock->select_waiting >= 0", sock->select_waiting >= 0);
>>
>>
>> Do I remember correctly that there was a bug in there somewhere?
>> Depending on your thread priorities, git master could fix the issue.
>>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
>> scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lwip-users/attachments/20150918
>> /aa2021bc/attachment.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:50:05 +0200
>> From: "Simon Goldschmidt" <address@hidden>
>> To: address@hidden
>> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select
>> Message-ID:
>>
>> <address@hidden
>> -bs60>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> Sandra Gilge wrote:
>>> I don?t want to move the complete code to the head revision.
>>> Is it enough to replace sockets.c to a newer version? Or is this a
problem?
>> Picking one file only will most certainly not work. You can do this on
your own, but honestly, I don't want to support this. If you don't want to
move to a newer version, you will have to identify the fixing changes and
try to apply them to your version.
>>
>>> I guess it is the issue #31741 that might be the problem?
>> Maybe. But maybe that's not all, I don't know, sorry.
>>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lwip-users mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>>
>> End of lwip-users Digest, Vol 145, Issue 9
>> ******************************************
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 21:38:47 +0200
From: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
To: Mailing list for lwIP users <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Sandra Gilge wrote:
> Updating new revisions is with my port is not so easy since the port
> for Blackfin is from analog devices and they made quite some changes
> to the lwip stack.
Do they have a download link where I could check the sources they provide?
I'm always interested in seeing what the changes are processor vendors seem
to think are necessary...
I have no doubt that they would report a bug if their changes were only
bug-fixing ones... :-)
Simon
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 21:45:59 +0200
From: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
To: Mailing list for lwIP users <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Sandra Gilge wrote:
> is there a stable revision between the head revision and the latest
> revision I could take?
If you mean between 1.4.1 and git master, then no, unfortunately.
Simon
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
End of lwip-users Digest, Vol 145, Issue 10
*******************************************