lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] [lwip-devel] [bug #25882] TCP hangs on MSS > pcb->snd_w


From: Simon Goldschmidt
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] [lwip-devel] [bug #25882] TCP hangs on MSS > pcb->snd_wnd
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:28:03 +0100

I can't repeat it often enough, *please* do write emails to the list, not to 
our private email addresses. Writing to private email addresses creates the 
feeling of demanding dedicated persons to answer a question that can possibly 
answered by many other people monitoring the list! Plus any questions arising 
(or being answered) in personal emails cannot be found by anyone having the 
same issue/question (now or in the future).


That being said, you can get patches either by using git (as explained on 
https://savannah.nongnu.org/git/?group=lwip):

git clone git://git.savannah.nongnu.org/lwip.git

or by using the repository browser (also linked from the above page):

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lwip.git

There you can find the list of changes (-> log) or browse the source tree and 
download individual files (-> tree).

Simon



"Pow, Christopher (SWCOE)" <address@hidden> wrote:
> How do I get a patch of this fix?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
> Simon Goldschmidt
> Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 7:18 AM
> To: Simon Goldschmidt; Kieran Mansley; Homyak; Jakob Stoklund Olesen; tao
> tang; address@hidden
> Subject: [lwip-devel] [bug #25882] TCP hangs on MSS > pcb->snd_wnd
> 
> Update of bug #25882 (project lwip):
> 
>                   Status:               Need Info => In Progress          
>  
> 
>     _______________________________________________________
> 
> Follow-up Comment #16:
> 
> I've pushed a fix for this where we make sure we don't allocate segments
> bigger than half the max. window we ever received. That way, we always
> send at
> least 2 segments per full window and the problem stated in the summary is
> fixed.
> 
> There is of course still a theoretical possibility of a host not ACKing
> but
> I'm not sure we really need to fix this, can that ever happen? It would
> mean
> that the remote host as more than a half rx window of data that it could
> ACK.
> That would surely be a bug in the remote host's tcp, wouldn't it?
> 
>     _______________________________________________________
> 
> Reply to this item at:
> 
>   <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?25882>
> 
> _______________________________________________
>   Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
>   http://savannah.nongnu.org/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel

-- 
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]