[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in different con
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in different context |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Dec 2011 08:04:14 +0100 |
Ueli Niederer <address@hidden> wrote:
> - Am I missing something if I wrap every tcp_*-call and the
> relevant portions of a callback in SYS_ARCH_PROTECT/SYS_ARCH_UNPROTECT
> calls if I want to cross a context border?
In your scenario below (where the input and timer processing is effectively
locked, already, since it runs in the ISR context that you protect from, I
assume), it should suffice to lock interrupts for all calls into the stack
(i.e. tcp_write, etc.). This assumes that the stellaris netif driver can handle
this correctly.
> - Is it correct, that pbuf_*-calls and memp_*-calls are already
> constructed thread-safe?
Partly. Allocation/deallocation and pbuf_ref() are safe as long as
SYS_ARCH_PROTECT is implemented correctly and enabled, they should be safe to
use from ISR vs. application level. Other functions like pbuf_header() are not
safe, but in your scenario, that should be OK.
In general, it would be a better idea to enqueue RX packets for processing at
application level, though, so that lwIP runs completely at application level.
Simon
--
NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie!
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
- [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in different context, Ueli Niederer, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in different context,
Simon Goldschmidt <=
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in differentcontext, Gisle Vanem, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in differentcontext, Kieran Mansley, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in differentcontext, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, Gisle Vanem, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, Kieran Mansley, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, Ueli Niederer, 2011/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, mat henshall, 2011/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, junix, 2011/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, mat henshall, 2011/12/08