Re: [lwip-users] Bug in netconn_alloc?

[Simon Goldschmidt]

"Walter Saegesser" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Thanks for the instructions. I completely misinterpreted the use of
> sys_mbox_set_invalid / sys_sem_set_invalid. I thought you just wanted to
> invalidate a previously valid mbox or sem.
> Does 'sys_xxx_free' also have to invalidate the the mbox or sem, i.e.
> *mbox = NULL or is this always done by a call to xxx_set_invalid?

No, set_invalid is called extra.

BTW: please use the reply function in your mail application, this makes sure 
That emails are shown in one thread in other mail apps.

Simon
>