[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input()
From: |
Martin Velek |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input() |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:27:43 +0100 |
Hi,
> Assuming your call to netif_add() uses tcpip_input as its
> last parameter, there is no need for additional locking (the frames are
> simply posted into an mbox which is inherently protected)
I would like to point out, the netif_* functions should not be used at
all when tcp_ip thread is running. Use netifapi_netif_* instead. See
http://lwip.wikia.com/wiki/Initialization_using_tcpip.c
Martin
- [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input(), Paul Archer, 2010/12/06
- Re: [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input(), Simon Goldschmidt, 2010/12/06
- Re: [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input(), Paul Archer, 2010/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input(), Paul Archer, 2010/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input(), Martin Velek, 2010/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input(), Yoav Nissim, 2010/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input(),
Martin Velek <=
- RE: [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input(), Bill Auerbach, 2010/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input(), Yoav Nissim, 2010/12/08
- Re: RE: [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input(), Simon Goldschmidt, 2010/12/09
- Re: RE: [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input(), Paul Archer, 2010/12/09
- Re: [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input(), Simon Goldschmidt, 2010/12/10
- Re: RE: [lwip-users] Length of the packet from low_level_input(), Martin Velek, 2010/12/10