[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] IP Address Display Functions
|
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
|
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] IP Address Display Functions |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:00:55 +0100 |
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:57 +0530, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
> Why can't we have a single "packed" attribute at the end of the struct instead
> of using it each time at the field level?
Different compilers have different syntaxes for declaring packing. That
is why we have the PACK_STRUCT_STRUCT and PACK_STRUCT_FIELD macros.
Kieran
- [lwip-users] Possible deadlock in LWIP 1.3.1 RC1, Eran Rundstein, 2009/08/23
- Re: [lwip-users] Possible deadlock in LWIP 1.3.1 RC1, Kieran Mansley, 2009/08/24
- RE: [lwip-users] IP Address Display Functions, Kieran Mansley, 2009/08/25
- RE: [lwip-users] IP Address Display Functions, Kieran Mansley, 2009/08/25
- RE: [lwip-users] IP Address Display Functions, Kieran Mansley, 2009/08/25
- [lwip-users] Re: IP Address Display Functions, Jakob Stoklund Olesen, 2009/08/25
- RE: [lwip-users] Re: IP Address Display Functions, Bill Auerbach, 2009/08/25
- Re: [lwip-users] Re: IP Address Display Functions, address@hidden, 2009/08/25
- Re: [lwip-users] Re: IP Address Display Functions, address@hidden, 2009/08/25
- RE: [lwip-users] Re: IP Address Display Functions, Bill Auerbach, 2009/08/26
Re: [lwip-users] Possible deadlock in LWIP 1.3.1 RC1, Eran Rundstein, 2009/08/24