Re: [lwip-users] Reentrency problem within mem.c module

[Simon Goldschmidt]

Am 25.10.2007 um 17:21 schrieb Siva Velusamy:

> The solution of this problem, once found was simply to add  
> SYS_ARCH_PROTECT protection mechanism as an alternative to  
> sys_sem_xxx function already present. The generic form is :
>
> #if SYS_LIGHTWEIGHT_PROT
>    SYS_ARCH_PROTECT(level)
> #else
>    sys_sem_wait(mem_sem)
> #endif /* SYS_LIGHTWEIGHT_PROT */
>
>
> I want to have your advice to known if it's something that must be  
> corrected (I believe so), or left as is.
>
>
> Yes, you need to have SYS_ARCH_PROTECT properly defined if you do  
> not implement the sys_arch layer.

mem_malloc() does't use the SYS_ARCH_PROTECT macros, so in this case,  
this doesn't help

Simon