lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [lwip-users] What lwIP version recommended (most stable)


From: Taranowski, Thomas \(SWCOE\)
Subject: RE: [lwip-users] What lwIP version recommended (most stable)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:16:45 -0500

I had problems with the 1.1.1 build, but 1.2 worked very well for me.  A couple 
days ago I started using the latest from cvs, and found it to be generally 
stable, although I've only tested normal TCP operation, via FTP.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of Wagner Hans-Jörg
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 2:14 PM
> To: Mailing list for lwIP users
> Subject: AW: [lwip-users] What lwIP version recommended (most stable)
> 
> Hi again,
> 
> Thanks for Jim's response. However Im realy not sure if I should use the
> newest 1.2.0 release cause of the notice on savannah.nongnu
> 
> "Note this release went without any release candidate cycles, so beware,
> test well, and report back any bugs."
> 
> Could the persons providing the latest patches give some advice? Is it the
> best approach to have 1.2.0 and applying all newest patches? Whats about
> the patches before the date 1.2.0 was released, do I have to use them as
> well?
> 
> Sorry for newbie questions
> Kind regards
> Hans-Joerg
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: address@hidden im Auftrag von Pettinato,
> Jim
> Gesendet: Fr 23.03.2007 16:57
> An: Mailing list for lwIP users
> Betreff: RE: [lwip-users] What lwIP version recommended (most stable)
> 
> Wagner,
> 
> The most recent release is 1.2.0.
> 
> Typically https://savannah.nongnu.org/news/?group=lwip
> <https://savannah.nongnu.org/news/?group=lwip>  is updated when a release
> is issued.
> 
> For more detailed information regarding releases and stability of such,
> you can also review the archives of these mailing lists:
> 
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lwip-users/
> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lwip-users/>
> 
> Note that there have been some API changes so there may be some
> modifications to your port required to get things working with your
> existing code base. Again, you can search the archives for specifics
> regarding these changes. Primarily you'll probably have to make tweaks to
> your lwIP initialization code and some simple mods to your SLIP driver.
> 
> 
> 
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf
> Of Wagner Hans-Jörg
>       Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:46 AM
>       To: address@hidden
>       Subject: [lwip-users] What lwIP version recommended (most stable)
> 
> 
>       Hi
> 
>       As I now have my SLIP lwip implementation running, the next steps
> will be to have it running with PPP.
> 
>       But the lwIP source I used for a single threaded SLIP was provided
> to me from another very kind person which used it two or more years ago.
> 
>       I think its better now to upgrade, but to what version?
> 
> 
>       Kind regards
>       Hans-Joerg
> 
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]