Re: [lwip-users] timeout argument in sys_arch_*() functions

[Mitani Hiroshi]

Thank you for your response.

Kieran Mansley wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Mitani Hiroshi wrote:
> > My question is that if the "timeout" argument is zero, should the thread
> > wait for signal, or just poll a semaphore and quit immediately?
>
> Timeout of zero means block forever until the semaphore is signalled.
> i.e. No timeout.

Thank you. This helps me. I could write my sys_arch.c.
But I have met next problem. Socket() does not work.
It seems that it is waiting (forever) for message in
netconn_new_with_proto_and_callback():sys_mbox_fetch(conn->mbox, NULL);.

Who will send a message to this mailbox?
--
mitani