[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems
From: |
K.J. Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems |
Date: |
04 May 2004 14:43:58 +0100 |
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 01:04, Timmy Brolin wrote:
> Mandatory
> alignment would render all those STRUCT_PACK macros unnecessary,
> resulting in cleaner code, and significantly increased portability (ANSI
> C conformant, no alignment problem, and no need to define architecture
> specific struct packing macros)
Padding of the start of the struct does not guarantee the alignment of
subsequent elements in that struct, so the packing is still required.
Kieran
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems, Timmy Brolin, 2004/05/01
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems, Jani Monoses, 2004/05/03
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems, Timmy Brolin, 2004/05/03
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems, Jani Monoses, 2004/05/04
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems,
K.J. Mansley <=
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems, d99tibr, 2004/05/04
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems, Jani Monoses, 2004/05/04
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems, Timmy Brolin, 2004/05/04
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems, Leon Woestenberg, 2004/05/04
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems, Timmy Brolin, 2004/05/04
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems, Leon Woestenberg, 2004/05/04
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems, Timmy Brolin, 2004/05/04
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems, Jani Monoses, 2004/05/05
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems, Jani Monoses, 2004/05/05
- Re: [lwip-users] Struct packing/alignment problems, Timmy Brolin, 2004/05/05