Re: [lwip-users] inet_ntoa()

[Jani Monoses]

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 09:57:01 -0500
Ed Sutter <address@hidden> wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> Maybe I'm missing something, but is there a reason
> why the version of inet_ntoa() that comes with LWIP
> is different than what I think is the standard?
> 
> LWIP:           u8_t *inet_ntoa(u32_t addr);
> LINUX/SOLARIS:  char *inet_ntoa(struct in_addr in);
> 
> I realize that functionally they're the same; however,
> they're not interchangeable at compile time.  This isn't
> a big deal, but it causes changes to code that comes
> from other environments, so it seems like it should
> abide by the calling syntax used most often.
> Or am I just confused?

Now fixed in CVS. Thanks.

Jani