lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 14:40:55 +0500


From: Mumtaz Ahmad
Subject: [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 14:40:55 +0500
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 00:13:15 -0000

Hi
well the flags u mentioned are not in code ..i donot know at what code your
are looking at (sorry if it sounds rude) and my question is still there .If
the TF_ACK_NEXT flag is never set then how come delayed acks are
transmitted?

Regards
Mumtaz Ahmad
----- Original Message -----
From: Kieran Mansley <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: [lwip] Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 14:40:55 +0500


> On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Mumtaz Ahmad wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > in tcp_fasttmr TF_ACK_NEXT flags are checked and Delayed acks are
> > transmitted for those tcp_pcb. But i cannot see where this flag is set
> > in the code .Any body help me in this regard
>
> There is no TF_ACK_NEXT flag as far as I know - a quick grep the source
> doesn't turn anything up.  The two flags that control ACKs are TF_ACK_NOW
> and TF_ACK_DELAY.  These are both set in tcp.h, using the macros
> tcp_ack() and tcp_ack_now()
>
> Hope that helps
>
> Kieran
>
> [This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]

[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]