[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:44:32 -0000 |
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Jani Monoses wrote:
> As far as broken compilers go I am totally against cluterring the code
> with even more ifdefs.
Me too, but if there are two equivalent ways of doing something, and one
breaks someone's compiler, we can use the other. If the two ways are not
equivalent, or we have two conflicting compilers, we have a problem, but
in this particular case I don't think we do.
Kieran
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port, David Haas, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port,
Kieran Mansley <=
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port, Robert, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port, Robert, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/09