[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc

[John C. Toman]

Hi Leon,

I like the javadoc/doxygen suggestion, and have started down that path 
previously for documenting the DNS client code I've been working on. I 
have great familiarity with it from five years of Java development.

Regards,

John

address@hidden wrote:

>Hello,
>
>now that work is underway to have a CVS lwIP tree, I would
>suggest to standardize on a (self)documentation format.
>
>Proposal is JavaDoc format.
>
>Arguments have been given earlier (search the mailing list
>on "javadoc" and "doxygen") and I recall there was much
>agreement on this.
>
>Regards,
>
>Leon Woestenberg
>
>Axon Digital Design
>Phone: +31 13 511 6666
>Fax: +31 13 511 4151
>web: www.axon.tv
>
>================================================================================
>
>=====================
>The information contained in this communication is confidential and is
>intended
>solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.
>Axon
>Digital Design Group is neither liable for the proper nor for the complete
>transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any
>
>delay in its receipt. Axon Digital Design Group does not guarantee that the
>
>integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the
>communication
>is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. If you are not the
>intended
>recipient of this communication, you are hereby notified that reading,
>disseminating, distributing or copying this message is strictly prohibited.
>In
>that case please return the communication to the sender and delete and
>destroy
>all copies. In carrying out its engagements, Axon Digital Design Group
>applies
>general terms and conditions, which contain a clause that limits its
>liability.
>A copy of these terms and conditions is available on request free of
>charge.
>================================================================================
>
>=====================
>
>[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
>  
>




[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]