[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?
From: |
Manik, Raina (IE10) |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ? |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:02:17 -0000 |
Paul, a quick question ...
If what you're saying does happen, what will happen
to the companies which are already using this code
and are selling/distributing the binaries ?
Can they continue to use older versions of lwIP
which they're using which has the old license ?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Sheer [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 2:38 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?
>
>
>
> One of things I'd like to see before more work is done,
> is that the LwIP should go GPL or LGPL to prevent people
> from using the code, and not contributing back to the project
>
> thoughts?
>
> -paul
>
>
> Powered by World Online - http://www.worldonline.co.za
>
>
>
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?,
Manik, Raina (IE10) <=
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Manik, Raina (IE10), 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Rod Boyce, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, John C. Toman, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Paul Sheer, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Leon Woestenberg, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/09