[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use
From: |
Adam Dunkels |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:44:06 -0000 |
Hi Paul!
On Thursday 14 March 2002 07.51, you wrote:
> Note that I have done some bug fixes to lwIP that I had submitted
> to James, but I havn't checked if they have been included. You
> generally have to use a memory allocation tracer to see that
> everything is in order. I also substitute all lwIP allocation
> with my own.
Do you mean that you have submitted patches to Adam, or have you sent James
patches that I haven't received? :-)
The patches you sent to the list earlier was included in the 0.5.2 release.
/adam
--
Adam Dunkels <address@hidden>
http://www.sics.se/~adam
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, Leon Woestenberg, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, Paul Sheer, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, James Roth, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use,
Adam Dunkels <=
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, James Roth, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, James Roth, 2003/01/09