[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence
From: |
Adam Dunkels |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:21:13 -0000 |
Hi Leon!
On Thursday 27 December 2001 09.53, you wrote:
> > I wouldn't recommend killing off all active connections just because the
> DHCP
> > client fails to get a lease, however! If your system has a short network
> > outage at the "right time", i.e., just when it is about to renew its
> address
> > it might timeout and think that it didn't get a lease. When the DHCP
> client
>
> If DHCP is implemented right, this is not an issue:
Ok, great!
> > best. Option 2 will make you receive all packets; an IP address of
> all-zeroes
> > means IP_ADDR_ANY. The reason for this behaviour is to allow DHCP clients
> to
> > boot with a network interface that accepts all incoming packets including
> > DHCP offers.
>
> Adam, this is really great! I already thought this would be the largest
> amount of
> work to implement, but if it's already there, great!
Yes, I fixed it when I was toying with a DHCP client myself, and it worked
for me so I guess it should work as expected.
/adam
--
Adam Dunkels <address@hidden>
http://www.sics.se/~adam
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence,
Adam Dunkels <=
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence, leon . woestenberg, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence, John C. Toman, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence, leon . woestenberg, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/09