[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] [task #10088] Correctly implement close() vs. shutdown()
|
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
|
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] [task #10088] Correctly implement close() vs. shutdown() |
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:31:06 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6 |
Follow-up Comment #23, task #10088 (project lwip):
I saw the problem below with the httpd that called tcp_close after all data
has been enqueued. To prevent counting sent-datalen, adding a linger option
would be nice, I guess. Although that might have to include a timeout, which
lets the pcb grow again.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?10088>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/