RE: [lwip-devel] A few issues

[Bill Auerbach]

Strictly speaking, ret_type function_name() is not Standard C, but a C++ 
shortcut that some compilers take to mean void.  Although K&R C defined this 
syntax, it meant no argument information, not void (which didn't exist in K&R). 
ret_type function_name (void) is correct.

Bill

>-----Original Message-----
>From: address@hidden
>[mailto:address@hidden On
>Behalf Of Simon Kallweit
>Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:20 PM
>To: lwip-devel
>Subject: Re: [lwip-devel] A few issues
>
>address@hidden wrote:
>>> I'll have a look into that. Maybe the correct includes are missing.
>> Should be fixed. Would you mind trying, Simon?
>
>Still got the warning. Adding a void parameter helped:
>
>struct netif *ip_current_netif(void);
>const struct ip_hdr *ip_current_header(void);
>
>Simon
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>lwip-devel mailing list
>address@hidden
>http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel