[lwip-devel] [task #7235] Create timeout framework for NO_SYS=1

[Simon Goldschmidt]

Follow-up Comment #14, task #7235 (project lwip):

Oh, and something about the implementation of nosys_timers:

when a timer elapsed, you do the following:

t.timer -= t.timer_interval;

I suppose you do it like that to minimize timer jitter. However, it might be
better to set t.timer to zero (or at least have an upper limit for t.timer
after it is substracted) to prevent timers of taking too much processor
time...?

Also, I'm not sure the wraparound check really works like that ...?

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?7235>

_______________________________________________
  Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/