Re: [lwip-devel] New extra large timeout value

[Kieran Mansley]

On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 08:37 -0600, Taranowski, Thomas (SWCOE) wrote:
> I just rolled in a bunch of the patches from CVS, and I now notice
> some new larger timeout values are being passed to the
> sys_arch_sem_wait routine, with the arp_timer() as the handler.  For
> example, I just got one with a timeout value of 4383 milliseconds.  I
> haven’t seen these values before, and am sort of curious to know if
> this is correct behavior before I proceed to ignore them.  

Would be grateful if you could investigate where they come from or what
change caused them.

Kieran