Re: [Ltib] Re: Changing ltib base dir

[Kumar Gala]

On Dec 1, 2006, at 11:00 AM, John Koleszar wrote:

> Kumar Gala wrote:
> > On Dec 1, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Stuart Hughes wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Kumar,
> > >
> > > I would be worried about making it / as this would make the host  
> > > support
> > > packages (that go into /opt/freescale/ltib) overwrite the host  
> > > you are
> > > installed on.  Also the LPP would end up as /pkgs, which again  
> > > probably
> > > is not idea.
> >
> > I'm not suggesting /, but /opt (this we'd get /opt/ltib and /opt/ 
> > pkgs)
>
> /opt/ltib and /opt/pkgs don't conform to the FHS. I can understand  
> the desire to
> remove the freescale reference, but I think unless you're going to  
> move all the
> files currently under /opt/freescale to a more standardized layout,  
> you really
> need an extra directory layer to encapsulate them. Simply renaming
> /opt/freescale to /opt/ltib might be sufficient (though /opt/ltib/ 
> ltib is ugly).
> But presuming to "own" a directory as generic as /opt/pkgs is unwise.

Fair enough, we could solve the problem by fixing it so pkgs lived  
under ltib so we'd have:

/opt/ltib
/opt/ltib/pkgs

- k