|From:||James, Edward Mr DTSW/TCS|
|Subject:||RE: Section heading breaking and @Protect (UNCLASSIFIED)|
|Date:||Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:04:27 -0500|
With Letter and both versions of @Protect I do not get any orphans.
With A4 and the original @Protect, I get the "8" orphan.
With A4 and your version of @Protect, I do not get any orphans.
Ed James, Contractor address@hidden
Defense Telecommunications Service - Washington/TCS voice 703-696-8815
1700 North Moore Street, Suite 1475 fax 703-693-7507
Arlington, VA 22209
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ludovic Courtès [mailto:address@hidden]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 03:40
> To: James, Edward Mr DTSW/TCS
> Cc: Lout Users List (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Section heading breaking and @Protect (UNCLASSIFIED)
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 12:42:58PM -0500, James, Edward Mr
> DTSW/TCS wrote:
> > I tried both ways and got exactly the same result. Then I
> realized, our
> > dsf file has Letter instead of A4. Using A4, what you
> described shows
> > the "8." orphan and then correctly on the next page.
> Using A4, I don't get the orphan 8th section heading with my own
> @Protect, do you? Anyway, it certainly needs to be made more robust.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|