Re: Latin 2 problem

[dr.Eduard Werner (Edward Wornar)]

Dnja Thu, 20 Sep 2001 Jeff Kingston pisa¹e:
>   > > I guess you're getting eth, but you really want dcroat (in some fonts
>   > > it's called dbar); while the uppercase letters Eth and Dcroat look
>   > > identical, the lowercase letters are quite different.  Lout's
>   > > LtLatin2.LCM encoding contains eth instead of dcroat, so you first
>   > > would have to change this.
>   > 
>   > Yes, the correct glyph names according to Adobe's glyph list are
>   > Dcroat/dcroat - the  should be fixed.
>   > 
>   > PS: Marko, have you submitted your Croatian data to Jeff?
>   > 
>   > SY, Uwe
>   > -- 
>   > address@hidden                         |       Zu Grunde kommen
>   > http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/            |       Ist zu Grunde gehen
> 
> I've substituted dcroat for both occurrences of eth, and Dcroat for
> both occurrences of Eth, in LtLatin2.LCM for the next release.  I hope
> I don't now hear from irate eth users - what will I do then?

You won't irate them easily. I can't think of latin2 users that will need it. 
But supporting
Unicode would be a good idea anyway :-)

Cheers

Edi

BTW: How do I unsubscribe of this mailing list?
-- 
           zzz. |\      _,,,---,,_
                /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_.
               |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'
              '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)