[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout
From: |
John Keith Hohm |
Subject: |
Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 19:56:38 -0600 |
> I'm the author of Lout and I'm applying for promotion. As
> part of my application I need to convince the committee
> that Lout is a good thing and that it has had an impact.
I'll write up something about how I use Lout for all my math work and
put it on my webpage, if you like. Would that be useful?
- evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Jeff Kingston, 1999/03/24
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, David Oxilia, 1999/03/24
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout,
John Keith Hohm <=
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Chip Salzenberg, 1999/03/24
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Chip Salzenberg, 1999/03/24
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Alex Povolotsky, 1999/03/25
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Daren Scot Wilson, 1999/03/25
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Wolfram Kahl, 1999/03/25
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Dale Arntson, 1999/03/25