Re: Make Lout -S switch the default?

[Rodrigo Vanegas]

> Therefore, I propose
> 
>  * the addition of a command line switch -U (for Unsafe), meaning exactly
> the opposite of -S: it allows calls to system();
> 
>  * an installation-time option to make either -S or -U the default if
> neither of these options is given for a particular invocation of Lout, with
> -U as the default default.
> 
> Any comments?

I second this.

Rodrigo <address@hidden>