DocumentFonts

[Jeff Kingston]

    From address@hidden Tue Jan  4 04:29:30 1994
    Received: by joyce.cs.su.OZ.AU with postie; Tue,  4 Jan 1994 04:29:30 +1100
    Received: by basser.cs.su.oz.au with MHSnet; Tue, 04 Jan 1994 04:29:28 +1100
    Received: from cs.brown.edu by MHSnet id 3h83M64k-+83Lv; Tue, 04 Jan 1994 
04:29:27 +1100
    Received: from cs.brown.edu (insecurely) by joyce.cs.su.OZ.AU;
        Tue, 04 Jan 1994 04:29:28 +1100
    Received: from rocky31.cs.brown.edu by cs.brown.edu (5.64+/Bullwinkle-1.7)
        id AA02336; Mon, 3 Jan 94 12:29:24 -0500
    Received: by rocky.cs.brown.edu (5.64+/BrownCS-1.2)
        id AA15996; Mon, 3 Jan 94 12:29:24 -0500
    Resent-Date: Mon, 3 Jan 94 18:28:49 +0100
    Resent-Message-Id: <address@hidden>
    Old-Return-Path: <address@hidden>
    Date: Mon, 3 Jan 94 18:28:49 +0100
    From: address@hidden (Hadmut Danisch)
    Message-Id: <address@hidden>
    To: address@hidden
    Subject: DocumentFonts
    Resent-From: address@hidden
    X-Mailing-List: <address@hidden> archive/latest/99
    X-Loop: address@hidden
    Precedence: list
    Resent-Sender: address@hidden
    
    
    Hello,
    
    I was wondering why Lout is not printing a 
    %%DocumentFonts line. The code is commented out
    in Procedure PrintClose in z24.c. Is there any
    special reason for commenting it out?
    
    Thanks
    Hadmut
    

Lout attempts to conform to Version 3 of the Document Structuring
Conventions as described in "PostScript Language Reference Manual
Second Edition".  On page 662 it states that DocumentNeededResources
should be used instead of DocumentFonts.

Conformance is not perfect at present but it is close.

Jeff Kingston