Re: [lmi] [PATCH] Add undisplayable_exception

[Greg Chicares]

On 2014-10-11 14:26Z, Greg Chicares wrote:
> On 2014-10-09 19:00Z, Greg Chicares wrote:
>> 
>> Just one small question. Is there a reason why this extraordinary
>> exception class should derive from std::runtime_error rather than
>> from std::exception?
> 
> I assume that's okay, because [...]

Oh, wait--it really is better to derive from a <stdexcept> class,
because that makes the implementation trivial: you don't have to
declare a std::string member and supply a definition of what()
that uses that member. And std::runtime_error is a better fit
than std::logic_error. Should I change this accordingly?