Re[2]: [lmi] Re[2]: enum types rewrite question

[Vadim Zeitlin]

On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:36:09 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:

GC> Yes, it's the new version. However, you have proposed a change to
GC> class template mc_enum that I still have not considered yet. I've
GC> glanced at it. I think I've understood the basic idea.

 The basic idea is to simply use pointers to arrays instead of references
to them -- MSVC has trouble with the latter, unfortunately.

GC> However, this seems to be the same template-argument-deduction
GC> problem that msvc has with class template mc_enum in general, so
GC> I think it's just another manifestation of the same problem.

 Indeed, and the fix was in fact exactly the same, so this is fixed
(locally) now. So the MSVC patch I sent before needs to be updated to
include these changes too now, please let me know when you have time to
look at it and I'll resend the latest version (which might include more
modifications by then...).

GC> At this moment, it is probably unnecessary for you to use the
GC> very latest lmi HEAD.

 I'd prefer to continue to track cvs HEAD because I'm afraid that diverging
too much from it is going to make my MSVC patches difficult to apply later.

 Regards,
VZ