[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Linphone-developers] gsm support
From: |
Simon Morlat |
Subject: |
Re: [Linphone-developers] gsm support |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:15:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-1-amd64; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) |
Dear Conrad,
I don't think they intentionnaly compile without gsm. Maybe it's a situation
inherited from the time where I turned gsm support to be external.
I asked debian maintainers to include gsm in their next package, I'll see
their answer.
I've also the project of creating a distro-independant binary tarball of
linphone, such as firefox guys do for their browser. It will consume more disk
space but at least will provide a solution for people who don't want to go
through the recompilation nightmare...
Simon
Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 01:14:58, Conrad Beckert a écrit :
> Hi Simon,
>
> > Internal gsm library is no more supported: install libgsm with apt-get,
> > yum or your favourite tool and run configure. It should detect it and
> > build gsm support.
>
> This is what happens. Unfortunately, for most distributions, there is no
> gsm support out of the box anymore (which is a pity since Linphone has
> always come with decent codec configuration).
>
> This is the case because packagers (at least those in Debian and Ubuntu) do
> not compile using libgsm. So it is not available unless one compiles
> himself.
>
> Not good. Speex often sounds really choppy on my Asterisk. Neiter iLBC
> support is available. PCM is not an option if one wants to have video as
> well.
>
> Ways around? I understand that they don't want a dependency of linphone to
> libgsm. So probably it might be a solution for Linphone to create some
> plugin framework enabling the end user to optionally install additional
> codecs later.
>
> I would have to bake my own version when I finally switch to Karmic. (as I
> did the last time) Hey - Version 3.2 looks cool- so one might be tempted
> to do so anyway.
>
> Greetings
> Conrad
>