[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Linphone-developers] nat traversal
From: |
strk |
Subject: |
Re: [Linphone-developers] nat traversal |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:28:43 +0200 |
I'm trying to avoid stun as a whole to see if I can get
linphone to work. But I see (with the command-line tool)
that the 'nat' command always says that nat is unused,
even if 'use_nat' is set to 1 in the .linphonerc file.
Browseing the source code, I see that there's no 'use_nat'
configuration string anymore, can anyone confirm ?
Is firewall_policy ever set to LINPHONE_POLICY_USE_NAT_ADDRESS ?
Where ?
TIA
--strk;
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 12:56:27AM +0200, strk wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:16:09PM +0200, Simon Morlat wrote:
> > Hi strk,
> >
> > Which version ?
>
> HEAD
>
> > Maybe the stun response takes too long to get back, thus linphone decides
> > to
> > send the register with the local address.
>
> mmm.. I'm not even sure a stun request is sent.
> Should I see it in the log file ?
>
> --strk;
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linphone-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers
--
() ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\ Keep it simple!
- Re: [Linphone-developers] nat traversal,
strk <=