[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how difficult would it be to have “auto-correct spacing” (even for j
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: how difficult would it be to have “auto-correct spacing” (even for just a single measure)? |
Date: |
Sun, 5 May 2024 07:15:29 -0400 |
Hi Jean,
> There might be ways to reduce the importance
> of accidentals in the spacing problem
I’ve tried a couple of different ways, but they are all pretty “destructive”
(e.g., the accidentals are ignored entirely, so they end up on top of each
other and the noteheads). Hopefully I can find a way!
> It's interesting though that adding
> \override Score.SpacingSpanner.spacing-increment = 5
> in \layout evens out the spacing a lot.
Yes, it does!
> it might be worth trying to flank that measure with \newSpacingSection
> and give it a different spacing-increment.
That goes a long way towards a solution, but (a) the notes still aren’t
perfectly even, and (b) I prefer the tighter spacing of the original layout.
Thanks,
Kieren.
______________________________________________
My work day may look different than your work day. Please do not feel obligated
to read or respond to this email outside of your normal working hours.