Re: Some openLilyLib packages/modules open for testing

[Simon Albrecht]

On 13.07.2018 17:59, Urs Liska wrote:
> In recent weeks (as you'll have noticed) I had the wonderful 
> opportunity to work on it on a partially paid basis: I had to 
> implement some functionality and was in essence paid to work on that 
> for 7x8 hours. What had to be created amounted to "half" an 
> openLilyLib package, so I decided to aim at the whole thing, working 
> of course more than these seven full days but also achieving 
> substantially more. But maybe most important is that I managed to 
> write comprehensive manuals along the way. They are authored in 
> Markdown (which is good) but so far only work in a 
> Markdown=>Pandoc=>LuaLaTeX=>PDF chain (which is less good because it 
> should also be possible to produce HTML sites). But they do exist, and 
> if the list rules allow you will see them attached to this post.

I’ve had a brief look into this and I’m really amazed – it seems to be 
exactly what I desire from such a package, and makes me wish I had a 
scholarly editing project to work on, to use and promote these tools :-)

Best, Simon