[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \longa and \maxima
From: |
Graham King |
Subject: |
Re: \longa and \maxima |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Jun 2018 20:29:17 +0100 |
On 6 Jun 2018, at 11:18, Urs Liska wrote:
> And I assume (hope) that the unusual glyph with two stems can be dismissed.
Outside of ligatures, I've never seen a notehead in mensural notation with an
upstem and a downstem on opposite sides. Even a plica (which this is not) has
two upstems or two downstems. Usually, a longa is a brevis with downstem to
the right (signifying doubling* the note value), and a maxima is a longa with
an elongated head (again doubling* the value). Sometimes the downstem is
replaced by an upstem (always to the right) without changing the semantics.
An upstem to the left invariably signifies the start of a c.o.p. ligature (the
last ligature to survive in the era of printing). This is _not_ a c.o.p.
ligature (semibrevis-semibrevis).
Perhaps the thing that looks like an upstem here is merely a pointer to the
explanatory text above the stave?
HTH
-- Graham
*or possibly tripling if modus and/or maximodus are "perfect".
Re: \longa and \maxima, Mats Bengtsson, 2018/06/06