Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

[Urs Liska]

Am 11.01.2018 um 05:38 schrieb Vaughan McAlley:

On 8 Jan 2018 12:35 p.m., "Andrew Bernard" <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi Urs and All,

A totally successful install on a new Ubuntu 17.10 pristine image. All works fine as per the source installations now updated.

A large vote of thanks to all who untangled this ball of wool. Despite a lifetime of software development experience, I kept going round in circles and never got it working. A big achievement and well done to you all.

Andrew

On 7 January 2018 at 20:38, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:

I've done a new iteration on the Wiki page. I've also added a concise walkthrough at the end that leaves out all the explanations and 

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

It's good to know it's possible. Does anyone know whether a failed installation of Frescobaldi 3 endangers a working 2.20 installation?

It *should* not, but of course that's a risky statement in the context of this thread ;-)

The packages don't affect each other, the point is to cleanly invoke the right Python version with the right entry file and the right python-ly in the pythonpath.

How did you install 2.20 and what OS distribution are you on?

Urs

Vaughan

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user