[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is anyone maintaining midi2ly?
From: |
David Wright |
Subject: |
Re: Is anyone maintaining midi2ly? |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Jan 2018 23:53:01 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat 30 Dec 2017 at 23:11:04 (+0000), Michael Ellis wrote:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>
> - I get correct PDF output on 2.21.0 but a nonsensical wash of bar
> checks that appear to cater to 2/4 throughout.
>
> Thanks for testing it, David. What options did you use for midi2ly and
> lilypond? My command lines were:
>
> ./midi2ly.py -o meter.ly -n -V 1 meter.midi
What's odd to me is that all the midi2ly programs I have
are lacking the .py extension. They also object to being
fed a -n option. (Also, the program wouldn't normally be
found in the same directory as users' data files.)
> lilypond meter.ly
>
> I only got one bar check complaint when LP processed meter.ly which
> contains:
>
> TrackA = {
> \numericTimeSignature\time 4/4 c'4 d'4 e'4 f'4 | % orig
> \numericTimeSignature\time 2/4 g'8 a'8 g'8 g'8 a'8 g'8 c''4 | % orig
> \numericTimeSignature\time 6/8 c''4 g'8 a'8 g'8 g'8 a'8 g'8 | % orig
> \numericTimeSignature\time 2/4 c''4 c''4 r2 | % orig
> }
…whose format doesn't resemble the output I get from midi2ly with
$ ~/lilypond-2.19.80-1/bin/midi2ly -o /tmp/meter1980.ly /tmp/meter.midi
Cheers,
David.
meter1980.ly
Description: Text document