lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Triple slurring


From: Urs Liska
Subject: Re: Triple slurring
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:28:43 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0



Am 11.12.2017 um 10:08 schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:

I'm encountering triple slurs like in the attached
examples. Discussion came to the conclusion that I should not
"modernize" the notation using only one slur but regard it as an
expressive means.
Any ideas?
(And particularly ideas that also work with LilyPond 2.18?)
spanner-id (only as string) was introduced in version 2.15.5.  The
convenient way of setting it via \= is a 2.19 thing, but you can do the
same with a function of your own or manually.
Oh um, that will give you three slurs.  They will still be attached to
the whole chord, so not overly useful.  You'll either need extensive
slur coordinate manipulation,

That means using my "fake polyphony" together with \shape, isn't it?
Probably it's the best I should do in the current case.

or you'll have to rely on 2.19 for
in-chord slurs (which can be attached to single notes) after all.


Could you give me an example? I'm not sure I see what you mean.

Urs



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]